encapsulation: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents principle
Weight: 0.54
, application
Weight: 0.54
, feature
Weight: 0.52
, term
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings layer
Weight: 0.31
, texture
Weight: 0.31
, replication
Weight: 0.31
, attachment
Weight: 0.31
, characteristic
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(encapsulation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(encapsulation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(encapsulation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(encapsulation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(texture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(texture, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(encapsulation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(encapsulation, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(encapsulation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(encapsulation, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(encapsulation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(encapsulation, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(encapsulation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(encapsulation, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(encapsulation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(encapsulation, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(encapsulation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(encapsulation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(encapsulation, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(encapsulation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(encapsulation, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(encapsulation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(encapsulation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(texture, has quality good)