end: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents third party
Weight: 0.63
, resolution
Weight: 0.61
, point
Weight: 0.61
, period
Weight: 0.60
Siblings beginning
Weight: 0.34
, time
Weight: 0.32
, fiscal year
Weight: 0.32
, pressure point
Weight: 0.32
, field goal
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality worth 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(end, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(field goal, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(end, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(field goal, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(field goal, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(end, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(end, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(end, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(end, has quality worth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(end, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(end, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(end, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(end, has quality worth)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(end, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(end, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(end, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(end, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(end, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(end, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(end, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(end, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(field goal, has quality worth)