energy: be better than other renewable energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.68
, sector
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings solar energy
Weight: 0.88
, wind
Weight: 0.62
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.60
, thermal energy
Weight: 0.57
, specific heat
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than other renewable energy 1.00
be better than renewable energy 0.99
be better than other non renewable energy 0.98
be better than non renewable energy 0.98
be renewable energy 0.95
is renewable energy 0.94
be considered renewable energy 0.94
have considered renewable energy resources energy 0.93
is renewable energy source 0.91
renewable source of energy 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than other renewable energy)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than renewable energy)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, is renewable energy source)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, renewable source of energy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(solar energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better than other renewable energy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better than renewable energy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(solar energy, is renewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(solar energy, is renewable energy source)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(solar energy, renewable source of energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(solar energy, renewable source of energy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(energy, be better than other renewable energy)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, is renewable energy source)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(energy, is renewable energy source)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(energy, is renewable energy source)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(energy, is renewable energy source)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than other renewable energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(energy, be better than other renewable energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(solar energy, renewable source of energy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(solar energy, is renewable energy source)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than renewable energy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than other renewable energy)