energy: be better than wind energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.68
, sector
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings solar energy
Weight: 0.88
, wind
Weight: 0.62
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.60
, thermal energy
Weight: 0.57
, specific heat
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than wind energy 1.00
be better than energy 0.92
be better than other energy 0.90
be from wind renewable 0.88
be better than non energy 0.86
be better than electricity 0.85
be better than other non energy 0.85
be expensive than energy 0.85
be different than potential energy 0.84
be better than thermal energy 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be different than potential energy)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than electricity)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than other energy)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than wind energy)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than energy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(solar energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better than wind energy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(solar energy, be better than energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better than energy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(solar energy, be better than other energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better than other energy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(solar energy, be better than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better than electricity)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be expensive than energy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be different than potential energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be different than potential energy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(energy, be better than wind energy)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(energy, be from wind renewable)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than electricity)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(energy, be better than electricity)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(energy, be better than electricity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(energy, be from wind renewable)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(energy, be better than electricity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(energy, be better than wind energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than wind energy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be different than potential energy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than energy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than electricity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than other energy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(solar energy, be expensive than energy)