energy: be consider renewable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.68
, sector
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings solar energy
Weight: 0.88
, wind
Weight: 0.62
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.60
, thermal energy
Weight: 0.57
, specific heat
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be consider renewable 1.00
be considered renewable 0.96
be renewable 0.94
is renewable 0.94
is renewable resorce 0.94
be considered renewable resource 0.91
be called renewable resources 0.89
be from wind renewable 0.89
is renewable resource 0.89
be classified as renewable 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be renewable)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wind, is renewable)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, is renewable)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be called renewable resources)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(wind, be considered renewable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(solar energy, be renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be renewable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(solar energy, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(solar energy, is renewable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(wind, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(wind, is renewable)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be renewable)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(solar energy, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(solar energy, be called renewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be called renewable resources)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(energy, be consider renewable)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be renewable)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, is renewable)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(energy, be renewable)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(energy, is renewable)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(energy, be from wind renewable)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(energy, is renewable)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(energy, be renewable)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(energy, is renewable)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(energy, be renewable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(energy, be from wind renewable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(energy, be consider renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(solar energy, be called renewable resources)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(solar energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wind, be considered renewable)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(solar energy, is renewable)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(solar energy, be renewable)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(wind, is renewable)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be renewable)