energy: be more developed in western india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.68
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings solar energy
Weight: 0.88
, wind
Weight: 0.62
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.60
, thermal energy
Weight: 0.57
, specific heat
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more developed in western india 1.00
be more developed in india 0.95
be more important in india 0.87
be used in uk 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be more developed in western india)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be more developed in india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be more important in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(solar energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be more developed in western india)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(solar energy, be more developed in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be more developed in india)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(solar energy, be more important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be more important in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(energy, be more developed in western india)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(energy, be more important in india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(energy, be used in uk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(energy, be more important in india)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(energy, be more important in india)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(energy, be used in uk)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(energy, be more important in india)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(energy, be used in uk)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be used in uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(energy, be more developed in western india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(energy, be more developed in western india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(solar energy, be more developed in western india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(solar energy, be more developed in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(energy, be more developed in western india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(solar energy, be more important in india)