engineer: designing ship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.70
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, contractor
Weight: 0.65
, construction worker
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
Siblings physicist
Weight: 0.57
, james watt
Weight: 0.54
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, architect
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
designing ship 1.00
use design process 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(engineer, designing ship)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(engineer, designing ship)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(engineer, designing ship)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(engineer, use design process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(engineer, designing ship)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(engineer, use design process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(engineer, designing ship)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(engineer, use design process)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(engineer, designing ship)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use design process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(engineer, designing ship)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(engineer, designing ship)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(engineer, designing ship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(engineer, designing ship)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(engineer, designing ship)