engineer: need work together

Related concepts

Parents	scientist Weight: 0.70 , expert Weight: 0.65 , contractor Weight: 0.65 , construction worker Weight: 0.65 , employee Weight: 0.65
Siblings	physicist Weight: 0.57 , james watt Weight: 0.54 , geologist Weight: 0.37 , architect Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
need work together	1.00
need work	0.89
need have	0.81
need able	0.79
need know	0.79
need rng in place	0.77
need keep	0.76
need understand	0.76
need learn	0.75
is needed	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(construction worker, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(engineer, need work together)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(construction worker, need work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(engineer, need work together)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(employee, need understand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(engineer, need work together)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(construction worker, need work together)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(construction worker, need work)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(employee, need understand)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(employee, need understand)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need work)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need work together)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(architect, is needed)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(architect, need know)

0.00

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(architect, need work together)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(construction worker, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(engineer, need work together)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(construction worker, need work) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(engineer, need work together)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(employee, need understand) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(engineer, need work together)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(architect, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(architect, need work together)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(architect, need know) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(architect, need know)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(architect, is needed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(architect, is needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(engineer, need work together)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(engineer, need understand)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(engineer, need understand)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(engineer, need understand)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(engineer, need understand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(engineer, need work together)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(construction worker, need work together)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(construction worker, need work)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(employee, need understand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(architect, need work together)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(architect, need know)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(architect, is needed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(construction worker, need work together)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(construction worker, need work)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(engineer, need work together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(employee, need understand)