engineering: be better than hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents college
Weight: 0.65
, department
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, science
Weight: 0.63
, major
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, design
Weight: 0.35
, biology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than hard 1.00
is hard 0.87
be than harder english 0.84
be than harder medicine 0.84
is difficult 0.77
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(college, is hard)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(engineering, be better than hard)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(science, is hard)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(engineering, be better than hard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(college, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(engineering, be better than hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(science, is hard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(college, is hard)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(college, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(college, is hard)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(science, is hard)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(college, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(physics, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is difficult)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(design, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(college, is hard)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(science, is hard)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(college, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mathematics, is hard)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is hard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(physics, is hard)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(physics, is hard)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(computer science, is hard)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(computer science, is hard)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(design, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(design, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(computer science, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(computer science, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(computer science, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(computer science, is difficult)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(physics, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(physics, is difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(engineering, be better than hard)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be than harder english)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(engineering, be than harder english)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be than harder medicine)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(engineering, be than harder medicine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(engineering, be than harder english)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is hard)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(engineering, be than harder medicine)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(engineering, be than harder medicine)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(engineering, be than harder english)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is difficult)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(engineering, is hard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(engineering, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(engineering, is hard)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(engineering, is difficult)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(engineering, is hard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(engineering, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(engineering, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(engineering, is difficult)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(engineering, is difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(engineering, be better than hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(science, is hard)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(college, is hard)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(college, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mathematics, is hard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(design, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(physics, is hard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer science, is hard)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(physics, is difficult)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer science, is difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(science, is hard)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(college, is hard)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(engineering, be better than hard)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(college, has quality good)