engineering: be in making of cars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents college
Weight: 0.65
, department
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, science
Weight: 0.63
, major
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, design
Weight: 0.35
, biology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in making of cars 1.00
be to cars 0.90
be in making 0.86
has quality making 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(engineering, be in making of cars)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(engineering, be to cars)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(engineering, be in making)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(engineering, be to cars)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(engineering, be to cars)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be to cars)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(engineering, be in making)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(engineering, be in making)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(engineering, has quality making)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(engineering, has quality making)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(engineering, has quality making)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be in making)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality making)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be in making of cars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(engineering, be in making of cars)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(engineering, be in making of cars)