engineering: be to cars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents college
Weight: 0.65
, department
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, science
Weight: 0.63
, major
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, design
Weight: 0.35
, biology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to cars 1.00
be in making of cars 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(engineering, be to cars)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(engineering, be to cars)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(engineering, be to cars)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be in making of cars)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(engineering, be to cars)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(engineering, be in making of cars)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(engineering, be to cars)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(engineering, be in making of cars)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(engineering, be to cars)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(engineering, be in making of cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(engineering, be to cars)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(engineering, be to cars)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be to cars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(engineering, be to cars)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(engineering, be to cars)