engineering: has quality making

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents college
Weight: 0.65
, department
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, science
Weight: 0.63
, major
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, design
Weight: 0.35
, biology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality making 1.00
be in making 0.91
has quality good 0.84
has quality bad 0.83
be in making of cars 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(college, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(engineering, has quality making)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(science, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(engineering, has quality making)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(science, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(college, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(science, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(college, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(design, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(college, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(engineering, has quality making)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(science, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(engineering, has quality making)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(design, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(design, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(computer science, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(engineering, has quality making)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(engineering, be in making)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be in making)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(engineering, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(engineering, be in making)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(engineering, be in making)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be in making of cars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(engineering, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(engineering, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(engineering, be in making of cars)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(engineering, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(engineering, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(engineering, be in making of cars)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(engineering, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(engineering, be in making of cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality making)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(engineering, has quality making)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(science, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(college, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(design, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(science, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(engineering, has quality making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(college, has quality good)