engineering: is popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents college
Weight: 0.65
, department
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, science
Weight: 0.63
, major
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, design
Weight: 0.35
, biology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular 1.00
is most popular 0.91
be popular in india 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(design, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be popular in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(design, is popular)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(design, is popular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(computer science, is popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(computer science, is popular)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(computer science, be popular in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(engineering, is popular)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(engineering, is most popular)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(engineering, is most popular)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(engineering, is most popular)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is most popular)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(engineering, be popular in india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(engineering, be popular in india)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(engineering, be popular in india)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(engineering, be popular in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(engineering, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(design, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer science, is popular)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(computer science, be popular in india)