engineering: was invented

Related concepts

Parents	college Weight: 0.65 , department Weight: 0.64 , industry Weight: 0.63 , science Weight: 0.63 , major Weight: 0.62
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.36 , design Weight: 0.35 , biology Weight: 0.35 , mathematics Weight: 0.35 , physics Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was invented	1.00
was used create	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(science, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(engineering, was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(engineering, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(science, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(engineering, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(science, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(science, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(engineering, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(engineering, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(engineering, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(engineering, was invented)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(engineering, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(engineering, was used create)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(engineering, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(engineering, was used create)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(engineering, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(engineering, was used create)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(engineering, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(engineering, was used create)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(engineering, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(engineering, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(engineering, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(engineering, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(engineering, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(engineering, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(science, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(engineering, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(science, was invented)