england: be different to antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.68
, europe
Weight: 0.68
, italy
Weight: 0.64
, new zealand
Weight: 0.63
, world
Weight: 0.61
Siblings spain
Weight: 0.38
, france
Weight: 0.37
, germany
Weight: 0.37
, sweden
Weight: 0.36
, britain
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different to antarctica 1.00
be different 0.81
be different to latvia 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(europe, be different)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(england, be different to antarctica)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new england, be different)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(england, be different to antarctica)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(new zealand, be different)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(england, be different to antarctica)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(new zealand, be different)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new england, be different)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(europe, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(europe, be different)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new england, be different)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sweden, be different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(europe, be different)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(england, be different to antarctica)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new england, be different)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(england, be different to antarctica)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(new zealand, be different)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(england, be different to antarctica)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sweden, be different)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sweden, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(england, be different to antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(england, be different)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(england, be different to latvia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(england, be different)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(england, be different to latvia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(england, be different)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(england, be different to latvia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(england, be different)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(england, be different to latvia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(england, be different to antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(england, be different to antarctica)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new zealand, be different)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new england, be different)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(europe, be different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sweden, be different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new zealand, be different)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new england, be different)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(england, be different to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(europe, be different)