english language: be needed in industry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents english
Weight: 0.70
, language
Weight: 0.66
, subject
Weight: 0.65
, course
Weight: 0.63
Siblings old english
Weight: 0.77
, american english
Weight: 0.74
, grammar
Weight: 0.63
, vocabulary
Weight: 0.60
, chinese language
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed in industry 1.00
be important in business 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(language, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(english language, be needed in industry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(english language, be needed in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(language, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(english language, be needed in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(language, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(english language, be needed in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(english language, be needed in industry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(english language, be needed in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(english language, be needed in industry)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(english language, be needed in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(english language, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(english language, be needed in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(english language, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(english language, be needed in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(english language, be important in business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(english language, be needed in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(english language, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(english language, be needed in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(english language, be needed in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(english language, be needed in industry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(english language, be needed in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(english language, be needed in industry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(english language, be needed in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(language, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(english language, be needed in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(language, be important in business)