enterprise: be more expensive than alamo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.62
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, application
Weight: 0.58
, organization
Weight: 0.57
Siblings real estate
Weight: 0.67
, government
Weight: 0.65
, corporation
Weight: 0.65
, oil company
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than alamo 1.00
is more expensive 0.98
is expensive 0.88
is cheaper 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(client, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(client, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(enterprise, is more expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is more expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(enterprise, is cheaper)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(enterprise, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(enterprise, is more expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(enterprise, is cheaper)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(enterprise, is more expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(enterprise, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(enterprise, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(client, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)