entrepreneur: fail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents professional
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.62
, creator
Weight: 0.58
, enterprise
Weight: 0.57
, publication
Weight: 0.57
Siblings financier
Weight: 0.46
, businessman
Weight: 0.36
, investor
Weight: 0.34
, inventor
Weight: 0.33
, accountant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail 1.00
fail today 0.95
fail in uganda 0.86
fails 0.85
fail peter drucker 0.81
fail in venture 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(enterprise, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(entrepreneur, fail)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(enterprise, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, fail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(enterprise, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(entrepreneur, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(entrepreneur, fail)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(entrepreneur, fail today)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(entrepreneur, fail today)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(entrepreneur, fail today)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(entrepreneur, fail peter drucker)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(entrepreneur, fail peter drucker)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(entrepreneur, fail peter drucker)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(entrepreneur, fail today)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(entrepreneur, fail in uganda)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(entrepreneur, fail peter drucker)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(entrepreneur, fail in uganda)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(entrepreneur, fail in venture)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(entrepreneur, fail in uganda)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(entrepreneur, fail in uganda)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(entrepreneur, fail in venture)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(entrepreneur, fail in venture)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(entrepreneur, fail in venture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(entrepreneur, fail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(entrepreneur, fail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(enterprise, fail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(entrepreneur, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(enterprise, fail)