environment: affect communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.63
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, challenge
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mining
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.33
, ecology
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, financial institution
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect communication 1.00
be related to communication 0.93
fail due to lack of communication 0.81
affect relationships 0.78
affect business of organisation 0.77
affect business 0.77
affect health 0.77
affect system 0.76
affect development 0.76
affect business of certain organisation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(challenge, be related to communication)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(environment, affect communication)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail due to lack of communication)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(environment, affect communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, fail due to lack of communication)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(challenge, be related to communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(project, fail due to lack of communication)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(challenge, be related to communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(challenge, be related to communication)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(environment, affect communication)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail due to lack of communication)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(environment, affect communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(environment, affect communication)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect relationships)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect business of certain organisation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect development)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(environment, affect business of certain organisation)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(environment, affect development)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(environment, affect relationships)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(environment, affect business of certain organisation)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(environment, affect development)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(environment, affect development)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(environment, affect relationships)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(environment, affect business of certain organisation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(environment, affect relationships)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(environment, affect communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(challenge, be related to communication)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(project, fail due to lack of communication)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(challenge, be related to communication)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(environment, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(project, fail due to lack of communication)