environment: affect food choice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.63
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, challenge
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mining
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.33
, ecology
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, financial institution
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect food choice 1.00
is choice 0.86
affect natural selection 0.79
affect health 0.78
hydrogenate food 0.76
affect environment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sector, is choice)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(environment, affect food choice)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sector, is choice)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sector, is choice)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(industry, hydrogenate food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(industry, affect environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sector, is choice)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(environment, affect food choice)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mining, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mining, affect environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(industry, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(industry, affect environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(industry, hydrogenate food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(industry, hydrogenate food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(environment, affect food choice)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(environment, affect natural selection)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(environment, affect natural selection)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(environment, affect natural selection)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect natural selection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect food choice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(environment, affect food choice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(sector, is choice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(industry, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mining, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(industry, hydrogenate food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(environment, affect food choice)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(sector, is choice)