environment: affect micmac culture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.63
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, challenge
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mining
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.33
, ecology
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, financial institution
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect micmac culture 1.00
affect culture 1.00
affect environment 0.82
affect life 0.81
affect human life 0.78
affect human behavior 0.78
affect system 0.78
affect positively and or negatively local populations 0.77
affect business of organisation 0.77
affect business 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect human life)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect life)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(industry, affect environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mining, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mining, affect environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(industry, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(industry, affect environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ecology, affect life)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect life)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ecology, affect human life)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect human life)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(environment, affect micmac culture)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(environment, affect culture)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(environment, affect culture)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(environment, affect culture)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(environment, affect human behavior)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(environment, affect human behavior)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(environment, affect human behavior)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect culture)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect human behavior)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(environment, affect micmac culture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecology, affect culture)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(industry, affect environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mining, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ecology, affect life)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(ecology, affect human life)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)