environment: affect relationships

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.63
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, challenge
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mining
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.33
, ecology
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, financial institution
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect relationships 1.00
affect business of organisation 0.80
affect business 0.80
affect communication 0.78
affect life 0.78
affect business of certain organisation 0.78
affect behavior 0.77
affect environment 0.77
affect human behavior 0.76
affect micmac culture 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect life)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(industry, affect environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ecology, affect life)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect life)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mining, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mining, affect environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(industry, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(industry, affect environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(environment, affect relationships)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(environment, affect human behavior)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(environment, affect behavior)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(environment, affect human behavior)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(environment, affect behavior)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect business of certain organisation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(environment, affect business of certain organisation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(environment, affect communication)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(environment, affect behavior)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(environment, affect communication)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(environment, affect human behavior)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect communication)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(environment, affect communication)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(environment, affect business of certain organisation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(environment, affect business of certain organisation)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(environment, affect micmac culture)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect behavior)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect human behavior)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(environment, affect micmac culture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect relationships)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(environment, affect relationships)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(industry, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mining, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect relationships)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ecology, affect life)