environment: affected by chemical spills

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.63
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, challenge
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mining
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.33
, ecology
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, financial institution
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affected by chemical spills 1.00
affect water pollution 0.77
cause water pollution 0.76
affect pollution 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(industry, cause water pollution)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(industry, affect pollution)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mining, affect water pollution)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(industry, affect pollution)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(industry, affect pollution)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(industry, cause water pollution)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(industry, cause water pollution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(environment, affected by chemical spills)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(environment, affected by chemical spills)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(environment, affected by chemical spills)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mining, affect water pollution)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(industry, cause water pollution)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(industry, affect pollution)