environment: be considered system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.63
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, challenge
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mining
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.33
, ecology
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, financial institution
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered system 1.00
affect system 0.83
be regarded as market 0.77
be considered dynamic 0.77
be considered as activity 0.76
be considered as secondary activity 0.76
be considered science 0.75
be considered as backbone of economy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sector, be regarded as market)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(environment, be considered system)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sector, be considered as backbone of economy)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(environment, be considered system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(sector, be considered as backbone of economy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sector, be regarded as market)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered as backbone of economy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sector, be regarded as market)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sector, be regarded as market)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(environment, be considered system)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sector, be considered as backbone of economy)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(environment, be considered system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(industry, be considered as secondary activity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(environment, be considered system)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered dynamic)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(environment, be considered dynamic)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(environment, be considered dynamic)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(environment, be considered dynamic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(environment, be considered system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sector, be regarded as market)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sector, be considered as backbone of economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be considered as secondary activity)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sector, be regarded as market)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(environment, be considered system)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sector, be considered as backbone of economy)