environment: be in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.63
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, challenge
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mining
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.33
, ecology
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, financial institution
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in australia 1.00
be for australia 0.99
was introduced into australia 0.86
be in india 0.82
be for india 0.82
become in india 0.78
be in spain 0.77
be in philippines 0.77
be for modern india 0.77
be developed in zealand 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(challenge, be for india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(environment, be in australia)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(challenge, be for modern india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(environment, be in australia)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sector, become in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(environment, be in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sector, become in india)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(challenge, be for india)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(challenge, be for modern india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sector, become in india)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(challenge, be for india)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(challenge, be for modern india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mining, be for australia)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(challenge, be for india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(environment, be in australia)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(challenge, be for modern india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(environment, be in australia)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sector, become in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(environment, be in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mining, be for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mining, be for australia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mining, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mining, be in australia)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(mining, was introduced into australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(environment, be in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(environment, be in philippines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(environment, be in philippines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in philippines)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(environment, be in spain)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in spain)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(environment, be in spain)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(environment, be in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(environment, be in philippines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(environment, be in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(environment, be in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(environment, be in spain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(environment, be in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, become in india)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(challenge, be for india)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(challenge, be for modern india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mining, be in australia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mining, be for australia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mining, was introduced into australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, become in india)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(challenge, be for india)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(environment, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(challenge, be for modern india)