epilepsy: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental disorder
Weight: 0.74
, illness
Weight: 0.72
, disease
Weight: 0.67
, abnormality
Weight: 0.65
, spinal cord
Weight: 0.61
Siblings bipolar disorder
Weight: 0.41
, personality disorder
Weight: 0.39
, eating disorder
Weight: 0.38
, autism
Weight: 0.38
, dementia
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
be less of problem 0.86
is social problem 0.85
be problem in society 0.85
be social problem 0.85
is growing problem 0.84
has state concern 0.84
be less of problem in army 0.80
be considered health problems 0.80
were such problem during war 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem in army) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(illness, is growing problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(illness, be social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(illness, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(epilepsy, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(illness, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(illness, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(illness, be social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(illness, is growing problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem in army)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(illness, be social problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mental disorder, be less of problem in army)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illness, is social problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(illness, has state problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mental disorder, be less of problem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(illness, is growing problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be problem in society)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be considered health problems)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem in army) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(illness, is growing problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(illness, be social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(illness, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(dementia, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dementia, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(eating disorder, be problem in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be problem in society)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(eating disorder, be considered health problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be considered health problems)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dementia, has state concern)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(epilepsy, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(epilepsy, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mental disorder, be less of problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illness, is growing problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(illness, is social problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illness, has state problem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(illness, be social problem)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mental disorder, be less of problem in army)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be considered health problems)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dementia, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be problem in society)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dementia, has state concern)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illness, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mental disorder, be less of problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(illness, is social problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illness, is growing problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(illness, be social problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mental disorder, be less of problem in army)