equilibrium: be dynamic in nature

Property	Similarity
be dynamic in nature	1.00
is dynamic	0.92
be considered dynamic	0.90
is dynamic state	0.89
is dynamic process	0.87
be considered dynamic process	0.86
be said dynamic	0.85
be important in dynamics	0.83
be said dynamic in system	0.83
be said dynamic in closed system	0.78

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(equilibrium, is dynamic process)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(equilibrium, is dynamic)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, is dynamic state)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(equilibrium, is dynamic process)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in closed system)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in closed system)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(equilibrium, is dynamic process)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in closed system)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(equilibrium, is dynamic state)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in closed system)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(equilibrium, is dynamic)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, is dynamic)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(equilibrium, is dynamic state)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, is dynamic process)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(equilibrium, is dynamic)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(equilibrium, is dynamic state)

Parents	term Weight: 0.57 , concept Weight: 0.55 , thing Weight: 0.54 , movie Weight: 0.52
Siblings	harmony Weight: 0.32 , elasticity Weight: 0.32 , singularity Weight: 0.31 , cohesion Weight: 0.31 , duality Weight: 0.31

equilibrium: be dynamic in nature

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible