equilibrium: be important in dynamics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.57
, concept
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, movie
Weight: 0.52
Siblings harmony
Weight: 0.32
, elasticity
Weight: 0.32
, singularity
Weight: 0.31
, cohesion
Weight: 0.31
, duality
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in dynamics 1.00
be dynamic in nature 0.83
is dynamic 0.81
is dynamic process 0.79
is dynamic state 0.79
be considered dynamic 0.78
be said dynamic in system 0.78
be considered dynamic process 0.78
be said dynamic 0.77
be stable in dominant strategies 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(equilibrium, is dynamic process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(equilibrium, is dynamic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, is dynamic process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, is dynamic state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(equilibrium, is dynamic process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(equilibrium, is dynamic state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(equilibrium, is dynamic state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(equilibrium, is dynamic)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, is dynamic)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, is dynamic)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, is dynamic process)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, is dynamic state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)