equipment: get effects

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.61
, step
Weight: 0.60
, information
Weight: 0.59
Siblings fax machine
Weight: 0.74
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.72
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.71
, lawn mower
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
get effects 1.00
get interdimensional effects 0.81
impact environment in france 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(industry, impact environment in france)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(equipment, get effects)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(equipment, get effects)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(industry, impact environment in france)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(equipment, get effects)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(industry, impact environment in france)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(industry, impact environment in france)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(equipment, get effects)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(equipment, get effects)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(equipment, get effects)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(equipment, get effects)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(equipment, get effects)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(equipment, get interdimensional effects)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(equipment, get effects)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(equipment, get interdimensional effects)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(equipment, get effects)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(equipment, get interdimensional effects)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(equipment, get effects)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(equipment, get interdimensional effects)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(equipment, get effects)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(equipment, get effects)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(equipment, get effects)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(equipment, get effects)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(equipment, get effects)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(equipment, get effects)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(industry, impact environment in france)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(equipment, get effects)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(industry, impact environment in france)