equity: be expensive than debt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.67
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, financial institution
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stock market
Weight: 0.72
, stock option
Weight: 0.66
, mezzanine
Weight: 0.47
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.35
, investment
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive than debt 1.00
be more expensive than debt 0.99
be cheaper than debt 0.96
be better than debt 0.94
be more risky than debt 0.92
be riskier than debt 0.88
be more expensive than equity 0.85
be less expensive than equity 0.85
finance more expensive 0.83
be cheaper than equity wso 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(equity, be expensive than debt)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity wso) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(equity, be expensive than debt)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(equity, be expensive than debt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity wso) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(equity, be expensive than debt)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(equity, be cheaper than debt)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(equity, be cheaper than debt)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(equity, be better than debt)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(equity, be more expensive than debt)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(equity, be better than debt)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(equity, be more expensive than debt)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(equity, be better than debt)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(equity, be cheaper than debt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(equity, be more risky than debt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(equity, be better than debt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(equity, be cheaper than debt)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(equity, be more expensive than debt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(equity, be more expensive than debt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(equity, be more risky than debt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(equity, finance more expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(equity, finance more expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(equity, finance more expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(equity, finance more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(equity, be expensive than debt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(equity, be expensive than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)