equity: be more risky than debt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.67
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, financial institution
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stock market
Weight: 0.72
, stock option
Weight: 0.66
, mezzanine
Weight: 0.47
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.35
, investment
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more risky than debt 1.00
be riskier than debt 0.95
be more expensive than debt 0.93
be expensive than debt 0.92
be better than debt 0.90
be cheaper than debt 0.89
be riskier than bonds 0.88
be considered risky 0.87
be more expensive than equity 0.84
be less expensive than equity 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(equity, be more risky than debt)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(equity, be more risky than debt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(investment, be considered risky)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(investment, be considered risky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(investment, be considered risky)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(equity, be more risky than debt)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(equity, be better than debt)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(equity, be cheaper than debt)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(equity, be cheaper than debt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(equity, be better than debt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(equity, be more expensive than debt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(equity, be expensive than debt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(equity, be more expensive than debt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(equity, be riskier than bonds)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(equity, be better than debt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(equity, be expensive than debt)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(equity, be cheaper than debt)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(equity, be riskier than bonds)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(equity, be better than debt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(equity, be expensive than debt)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(equity, be more expensive than debt)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(equity, be expensive than debt)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(equity, be cheaper than debt)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(equity, be more expensive than debt)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(equity, be riskier than bonds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(equity, be more risky than debt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be less expensive than equity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(investment, be considered risky)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(equity, be more risky than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be less expensive than equity)