equity: be riskier than bonds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.67
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, financial institution
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stock market
Weight: 0.72
, stock option
Weight: 0.66
, mezzanine
Weight: 0.47
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.35
, investment
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be riskier than bonds 1.00
be riskier than debt 0.95
be more volatile than bonds 0.88
be more risky than debt 0.88
be considered risky 0.82
be risker than savings 0.81
be cheaper than debt 0.81
be less expensive than equity 0.80
be more expensive than debt 0.79
outperform bonds 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(equity, be riskier than bonds)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(investment, be considered risky)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(investment, be risker than savings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(equity, be riskier than bonds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(investment, be considered risky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(investment, be considered risky)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(investment, be risker than savings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(investment, be risker than savings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(equity, be riskier than bonds)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(equity, be more volatile than bonds)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(equity, be more volatile than bonds)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(equity, be cheaper than debt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(equity, be more volatile than bonds)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(equity, be more expensive than debt)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(equity, outperform bonds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(equity, be cheaper than debt)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(equity, be cheaper than debt)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(equity, be more risky than debt)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(equity, outperform bonds)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(equity, be more expensive than debt)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(equity, outperform bonds)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(equity, outperform bonds)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(equity, be more risky than debt)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(equity, be more volatile than bonds)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(equity, be more expensive than debt)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(equity, be cheaper than debt)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(equity, be more expensive than debt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(equity, be riskier than bonds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be less expensive than equity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(investment, be risker than savings)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(investment, be considered risky)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be less expensive than equity)