equity: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.67
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, financial institution
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stock market
Weight: 0.72
, stock option
Weight: 0.66
, mezzanine
Weight: 0.47
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.35
, investment
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
be good 0.82
has quality worth 0.82
be bad for country 0.80
taste bad 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
be bad for company 0.79
do good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(equity, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(debt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(equity, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(debt, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(equity, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(debt, be bad for country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(equity, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(equity, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(debt, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(debt, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(debt, be bad for country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(debt, be bad for company)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(debt, is bad thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for country)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for company)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(debt, is bad thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(stock option, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stock market, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(stock option, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(stock market, do good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(equity, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(debt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(equity, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(debt, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(equity, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(debt, be bad for country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(equity, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(equity, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(investment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(stock option, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stock option, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(stock market, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(stock option, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(stock option, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(stock market, do good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(stock market, do good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(equity, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(equity, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(equity, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(equity, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(equity, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(debt, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(debt, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for country)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for company)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(debt, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(investment, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(stock option, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stock option, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(stock market, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(stock market, do good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(debt, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(debt, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for country)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for company)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(debt, is bad thing)