erg: be related to deserts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.41
, member
Weight: 0.37
, energy
Weight: 0.31
, unit
Weight: 0.30
, rowing
Weight: 0.25
Siblings exercise
Weight: 0.28
, boot camp
Weight: 0.28
, basketball team
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to deserts 1.00
be related to desert 0.90
be related to african deserts 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(erg, be related to deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(erg, be related to deserts)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(erg, be related to deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(erg, be related to desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(erg, be related to deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(erg, be related to african deserts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(erg, be related to deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(erg, be related to desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(erg, be related to deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(erg, be related to african deserts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(erg, be related to deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(erg, be related to desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(erg, be related to deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(erg, be related to african deserts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(erg, be related to deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(erg, be related to african deserts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(erg, be related to deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(erg, be related to desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(erg, be related to deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(erg, be related to deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(erg, be related to deserts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(erg, be related to deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(erg, be related to deserts)