erosion: be harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.67
, process
Weight: 0.60
, concern
Weight: 0.59
, force
Weight: 0.59
, damage
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, fragmentation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful 1.00
be harmful to environment 0.92
be dangerous 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, be dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(desertification, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(desertification, be dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(erosion, be harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be harmful to environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(erosion, be harmful to environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(erosion, be harmful to environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(erosion, be harmful to environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be dangerous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(erosion, be dangerous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(erosion, be dangerous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(erosion, be dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(erosion, be harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(desertification, be dangerous)