error: affect validity of experimental dat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents omission
Weight: 0.63
, bug
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.58
, variation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mistake
Weight: 0.63
, slip
Weight: 0.61
, url
Weight: 0.59
, sin
Weight: 0.59
, ballot
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect validity of experimental dat 1.00
affect validity of dat 0.94
affect validity of experimental data 0.89
affect validity 0.84
affect validity of data 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mistake, affect validity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mistake, affect validity)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(mistake, affect validity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(error, affect validity of experimental dat)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(error, affect validity of dat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(error, affect validity of dat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(error, affect validity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(error, affect validity of experimental data)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(error, affect validity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(error, affect validity of data)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(error, affect validity of data)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(error, affect validity of experimental data)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(error, affect validity of experimental data)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(error, affect validity of dat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(error, affect validity of data)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(error, affect validity of experimental data)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(error, affect validity)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(error, affect validity of dat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(error, affect validity of data)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(error, affect validity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(error, affect validity of experimental dat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(error, affect validity of experimental dat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(error, affect validity of experimental dat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mistake, affect validity)