eskimo: have poor oral hygiene

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents native american
Weight: 0.57
, language
Weight: 0.55
, term
Weight: 0.50
, culture
Weight: 0.48
, society
Weight: 0.46
Siblings inuit
Weight: 0.45
, italian language
Weight: 0.33
, english language
Weight: 0.33
, chinese language
Weight: 0.33
, old english
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have poor oral hygiene 1.00
have oral hygiene 0.98
have poor hygiene 0.93
have hygiene 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(eskimo, have oral hygiene)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, have oral hygiene)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(eskimo, have oral hygiene)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(eskimo, have oral hygiene)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(eskimo, have hygiene)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, have poor hygiene)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(eskimo, have poor hygiene)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(eskimo, have hygiene)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(eskimo, have poor hygiene)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(eskimo, have poor hygiene)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(eskimo, have hygiene)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, have hygiene)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(eskimo, have poor oral hygiene)