eskimo: remain in igloos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents native american
Weight: 0.57
, language
Weight: 0.55
, term
Weight: 0.50
, culture
Weight: 0.48
, society
Weight: 0.46
Siblings inuit
Weight: 0.45
, italian language
Weight: 0.33
, english language
Weight: 0.33
, chinese language
Weight: 0.33
, old english
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
remain in igloos 1.00
keep in igloos 0.97
live in igloos 0.95
live in igloos made 0.94
live in igloos made of ice 0.93
make igloos out of snow 0.90
keep in igloo 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(inuit, live in igloos)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(inuit, live in igloos)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(inuit, live in igloos)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(eskimo, remain in igloos)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(eskimo, live in igloos made of ice)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, live in igloos)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(eskimo, live in igloos made of ice)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, live in igloos made of ice)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(eskimo, live in igloos)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, keep in igloos)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(eskimo, keep in igloos)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(eskimo, live in igloos made)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, live in igloos made)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(eskimo, live in igloos made)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(eskimo, keep in igloo)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(eskimo, keep in igloo)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(eskimo, live in igloos made of ice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, keep in igloo)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(eskimo, live in igloos)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(eskimo, keep in igloos)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(eskimo, live in igloos)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(eskimo, keep in igloo)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(eskimo, keep in igloos)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(eskimo, live in igloos made)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, make igloos out of snow)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(eskimo, make igloos out of snow)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(eskimo, make igloos out of snow)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(eskimo, make igloos out of snow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, remain in igloos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(eskimo, remain in igloos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, remain in igloos)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inuit, live in igloos)