esophagus: has quality worse

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mucous membrane
Weight: 0.66
, digestive system
Weight: 0.60
, organ
Weight: 0.57
, alimentary canal
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.55
Siblings small intestine
Weight: 0.36
, lung
Weight: 0.35
, irritable bowel syndrome
Weight: 0.35
, rectum
Weight: 0.35
, intestine
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worse 1.00
has quality bad 0.87
be worse at night 0.84
has quality good 0.84
has quality worth 0.77
has quality system 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(organ, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality worse)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(digestive system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality worse)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(condition, be worse at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality worse)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(digestive system, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality worse)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(digestive system, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(condition, be worse at night)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(organ, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(digestive system, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(condition, be worse at night)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, has quality system)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(organ, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(organ, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(esophagus, has quality worse)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(digestive system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(esophagus, has quality worse)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(condition, be worse at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(esophagus, has quality worse)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(digestive system, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(esophagus, has quality worse)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(intestine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(intestine, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(esophagus, has quality worse)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(esophagus, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(esophagus, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(condition, be worse at night)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(organ, has quality worth)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(intestine, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(condition, be worse at night)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(organ, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(esophagus, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality system)