esophagus: is stratified squamous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mucous membrane
Weight: 0.66
, digestive system
Weight: 0.60
, organ
Weight: 0.57
, alimentary canal
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.55
Siblings small intestine
Weight: 0.36
, lung
Weight: 0.35
, irritable bowel syndrome
Weight: 0.35
, rectum
Weight: 0.35
, intestine
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is stratified squamous 1.00
have stratified squamous epithelium 0.95
be lined with stratified squamous epithelium 0.94
have stratified epithelium 0.91
is squamous 0.90
be lined with stratified epithelium 0.88
be lined with squamous epithelium 0.83
is retroperitoneal 0.78
is vascularized 0.76
have simple columnar epithelium 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(intestine, have simple columnar epithelium)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(intestine, have simple columnar epithelium)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(intestine, have simple columnar epithelium)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(esophagus, is stratified squamous)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, have stratified squamous epithelium)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, be lined with stratified squamous epithelium)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(esophagus, is squamous)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, have stratified epithelium)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, be lined with stratified epithelium)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is squamous)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, be lined with squamous epithelium)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(esophagus, is squamous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(esophagus, is squamous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(esophagus, be lined with stratified squamous epithelium)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(esophagus, be lined with stratified epithelium)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(esophagus, have stratified squamous epithelium)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(esophagus, have stratified epithelium)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(esophagus, be lined with squamous epithelium)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(esophagus, be lined with stratified epithelium)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(esophagus, be lined with stratified squamous epithelium)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(esophagus, have stratified epithelium)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(esophagus, be lined with squamous epithelium)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(esophagus, have stratified squamous epithelium)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(esophagus, have stratified epithelium)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(esophagus, be lined with stratified epithelium)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(esophagus, be lined with squamous epithelium)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(esophagus, be lined with stratified squamous epithelium)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(esophagus, have stratified squamous epithelium)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is stratified squamous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(esophagus, is stratified squamous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is stratified squamous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(intestine, have simple columnar epithelium)