essence: has quality definition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.62
, magazine
Weight: 0.61
, substance
Weight: 0.58
, matter
Weight: 0.56
, publication
Weight: 0.56
Siblings proper noun
Weight: 0.33
, lyric
Weight: 0.33
, phrase
Weight: 0.33
, dark matter
Weight: 0.32
, f word
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality definition 1.00
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(magazine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(essence, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(essence, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(magazine, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(essence, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(magazine, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(magazine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(essence, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(essence, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(essence, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(essence, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(essence, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(essence, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(essence, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(essence, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(essence, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(essence, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(essence, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(essence, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(essence, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(essence, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(essence, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(essence, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(essence, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(essence, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(magazine, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(essence, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(magazine, has quality good)