ethics: be called science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.57
, journal
Weight: 0.57
, course
Weight: 0.54
, committee
Weight: 0.53
, book
Weight: 0.50
Siblings commission
Weight: 0.32
, theology
Weight: 0.32
, science fiction
Weight: 0.32
, political ideology
Weight: 0.31
, senate
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called science 1.00
is science 0.96
be in science 0.96
be considered science 0.93
be important in science 0.93
be called social science 0.92
be important part of science 0.91
be related to science 0.90
be called practical science 0.89
is practical science 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(theology, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(theology, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(ethics, be called science)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ethics, be considered science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ethics, be considered science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(ethics, be considered science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ethics, is science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ethics, is science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ethics, is science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be considered science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(ethics, is science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be called science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ethics, be called science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be called science)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(theology, is science)