ethics: is science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.57
, journal
Weight: 0.57
, course
Weight: 0.54
, committee
Weight: 0.53
, book
Weight: 0.50
Siblings commission
Weight: 0.32
, theology
Weight: 0.32
, science fiction
Weight: 0.32
, political ideology
Weight: 0.31
, senate
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is science 1.00
be in science 0.99
be called science 0.96
be important in science 0.95
be considered science 0.93
be related to science 0.92
be important part of science 0.92
be called social science 0.89
is practical science 0.88
be called practical science 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(theology, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(theology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(theology, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ethics, is science)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ethics, be considered science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be called science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(ethics, be called science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ethics, be called science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ethics, be considered science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(ethics, be considered science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be considered science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ethics, be called science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(ethics, is science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ethics, is science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(ethics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(theology, is science)