euglena: be considered heterotrophic

Related concepts

Parents	organism Weight: 0.43
Siblings	amoeba Weight: 0.26 , yeast Weight: 0.26 , human cell Weight: 0.26 , bacterium Weight: 0.26 , protozoan Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered heterotrophic	1.00
be considered autotrophic	0.92
be classified as plantlike protists	0.80
be classified as protists	0.79
be referred as single celled organism	0.78
differ from two phyla of flagellates	0.77
is unicellular	0.77
differ from other two phyla of flagellates	0.77
be regarded as animal	0.75
is protists	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(organism, is unicellular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(euglena, be considered heterotrophic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(organism, is unicellular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(organism, is unicellular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(protozoan, is unicellular)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(amoeba, is unicellular)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(bacterium, is unicellular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(organism, is unicellular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(euglena, be considered heterotrophic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(bacterium, is unicellular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(bacterium, is unicellular)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(amoeba, is unicellular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(amoeba, is unicellular)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(protozoan, is unicellular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(protozoan, is unicellular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Salient(euglena, be considered heterotrophic)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(euglena, be considered autotrophic)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(euglena, be considered autotrophic)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(euglena, be considered autotrophic)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(euglena, be classified as plantlike protists)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(euglena, is protists)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(euglena, be considered autotrophic)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(euglena, is protists)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(euglena, is protists)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(euglena, be classified as plantlike protists)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(euglena, is protists)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(euglena, be classified as plantlike protists)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(euglena, be regarded as animal)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(euglena, be classified as plantlike protists)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(euglena, be referred as single celled organism)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(euglena, be referred as single celled organism)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(euglena, be regarded as animal)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(euglena, be referred as single celled organism)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(euglena, be regarded as animal)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(euglena, be regarded as animal)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(euglena, be referred as single celled organism)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(euglena, be considered heterotrophic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(organism, is unicellular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(amoeba, is unicellular)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(protozoan, is unicellular)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(bacterium, is unicellular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(euglena, be considered heterotrophic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(organism, is unicellular)