euglena: be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.43
Siblings amoeba
Weight: 0.26
, yeast
Weight: 0.26
, human cell
Weight: 0.26
, bacterium
Weight: 0.26
, protozoan
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies 1.00
be well adapted to conditions of varying intensies 0.99
be well adapted to conditions of light intensies 0.94
be different 0.76
react to light 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(human cell, be different)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(yeast, be different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(human cell, be different)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(human cell, be different)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(yeast, be different)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(yeast, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(euglena, be different)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euglena, react to light)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(euglena, react to light)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(euglena, be different)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(euglena, react to light)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(euglena, react to light)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(euglena, be different)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(euglena, be different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(human cell, be different)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(euglena, be well adapted to conditions of varying light intensies)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(yeast, be different)