euglena: differ from other two phyla of flagellates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.43
Siblings amoeba
Weight: 0.26
, yeast
Weight: 0.26
, human cell
Weight: 0.26
, bacterium
Weight: 0.26
, protozoan
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ from other two phyla of flagellates 1.00
differ from two phyla of flagellates 1.00
be classified as plantlike protists 0.80
is unicellular 0.79
is protist 0.78
be classified as protists 0.78
is eukaryotic 0.77
is protists 0.77
be considered heterotrophic 0.77
be referred as single celled organism 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(organism, is unicellular)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(organism, is unicellular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(organism, is unicellular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(protozoan, is unicellular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(amoeba, is unicellular)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(human cell, is eukaryotic)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(protozoan, is eukaryotic)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bacterium, is unicellular)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(amoeba, is eukaryotic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(organism, is unicellular)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(bacterium, is unicellular)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(bacterium, is unicellular)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(amoeba, is unicellular)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(amoeba, is unicellular)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(protozoan, is unicellular)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(protozoan, is unicellular)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(amoeba, is eukaryotic)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(amoeba, is eukaryotic)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(protozoan, is eukaryotic)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(protozoan, is eukaryotic)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(human cell, is eukaryotic)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(human cell, is eukaryotic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(euglena, be classified as plantlike protists)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(euglena, is eukaryotic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(euglena, is protists)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(euglena, be considered heterotrophic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(euglena, is protists)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(euglena, is protists)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(euglena, is eukaryotic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(euglena, is eukaryotic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(euglena, be classified as plantlike protists)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(euglena, be considered heterotrophic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(euglena, be classified as plantlike protists)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(euglena, be considered heterotrophic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(euglena, be classified as plantlike protists)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(euglena, is protist)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(euglena, is protist)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(euglena, be referred as single celled organism)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(euglena, be referred as single celled organism)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(euglena, is protist)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(euglena, is protists)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(euglena, be considered heterotrophic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(euglena, be referred as single celled organism)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, is protist)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(euglena, be referred as single celled organism)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(euglena, is eukaryotic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(organism, is unicellular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(amoeba, is eukaryotic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(protozoan, is eukaryotic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(amoeba, is unicellular)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(protozoan, is unicellular)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(human cell, is eukaryotic)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bacterium, is unicellular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(euglena, differ from other two phyla of flagellates)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(organism, is unicellular)