european union: has quality organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents union
Weight: 0.69
, usa
Weight: 0.67
, united nations
Weight: 0.67
, south korea
Weight: 0.65
Siblings germany
Weight: 0.73
, latin america
Weight: 0.72
, new zealand
Weight: 0.71
, great britain
Weight: 0.70
, czech republic
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality organization 1.00
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(south korea, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(european union, has quality organization)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(union, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(european union, has quality organization)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(united nations, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(european union, has quality organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(united nations, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(union, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(south korea, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(south korea, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(united nations, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(union, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(latin america, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(germany, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(south korea, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(european union, has quality organization)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(union, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(european union, has quality organization)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(united nations, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(european union, has quality organization)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(germany, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(germany, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(latin america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(latin america, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(european union, has quality organization)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(european union, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(european union, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(european union, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(european union, has quality organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(united nations, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(union, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(south korea, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(germany, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(latin america, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(united nations, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(union, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(european union, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(south korea, has quality good)