euthanasia: be banned in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents practice
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, action
Weight: 0.59
, law
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, nazism
Weight: 0.32
, torture
Weight: 0.32
, masturbation
Weight: 0.32
, cloning
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in australia 1.00
be illegal in australia 0.91
be controversial in australia 0.87
be issue in australia 0.84
be illegal in canada 0.82
be illegal in zealand 0.81
be illegal in uk 0.81
is illegal uk 0.80
be illegal in new zealand 0.79
be illegal in malaysia 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(torture, be illegal in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(torture, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(torture, be illegal in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be banned in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be illegal in canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be illegal in canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be illegal in canada)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be illegal in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be issue in australia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be illegal in canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be illegal in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be issue in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is illegal uk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be issue in australia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be issue in australia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be illegal in zealand)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be illegal in zealand)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be illegal in uk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be illegal in new zealand)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be controversial in australia)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be controversial in australia)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be illegal in zealand)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be illegal in new zealand)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be illegal in zealand)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be illegal in australia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be illegal in australia)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be illegal in uk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be illegal in new zealand)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be illegal in malaysia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be illegal in uk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be illegal in new zealand)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is illegal uk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be illegal in uk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be illegal in malaysia)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be controversial in australia)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be illegal in malaysia)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be controversial in australia)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is illegal uk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be illegal in malaysia)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is illegal uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be banned in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be banned in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(torture, be illegal in canada)