euthanasia: be done on humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents practice
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, action
Weight: 0.59
, law
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, nazism
Weight: 0.32
, torture
Weight: 0.32
, masturbation
Weight: 0.32
, cloning
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be done on humans 1.00
be done 0.86
is done 0.86
be used on animals 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cloning, be done)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cloning, is done)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(cloning, be done)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(cloning, be done)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cloning, is done)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cloning, is done)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be done on humans)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be done)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be used on animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be done)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be used on animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be done)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be done)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be used on animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be used on animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be done on humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be done on humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cloning, be done)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be done on humans)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cloning, is done)