euthanasia: is ethical dilemma

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents practice
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, action
Weight: 0.59
, law
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, nazism
Weight: 0.32
, torture
Weight: 0.32
, masturbation
Weight: 0.32
, cloning
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is ethical dilemma 1.00
has state dilemma 0.91
is ethical issue 0.89
is ethical 0.86
be ethical 0.85
pose ethical questions 0.83
be ethical issue in new zealand 0.81
is moral issue 0.81
raise moral question 0.79
is legal issue 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(torture, is ethical)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(torture, is ethical issue)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cloning, is ethical)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(torture, is ethical issue)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(torture, is ethical issue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(cloning, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cloning, is ethical)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(torture, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(torture, is ethical)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be ethical issue in new zealand)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be ethical)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is moral issue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, pose ethical questions)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(euthanasia, raise moral question)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is legal issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is moral issue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, raise moral question)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is moral issue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is ethical issue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be ethical)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be ethical issue in new zealand)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is moral issue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is legal issue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, raise moral question)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(euthanasia, pose ethical questions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is ethical)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(euthanasia, raise moral question)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is ethical issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is ethical)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be ethical)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is legal issue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, pose ethical questions)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be ethical)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is legal issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be ethical issue in new zealand)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(euthanasia, pose ethical questions)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be ethical issue in new zealand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(torture, is ethical issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(torture, is ethical)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cloning, is ethical)